Net Zero Banking – a new project to support the transition of the Hungarian banking sector to climate neutrality
09.27.2022
Author: Tibor Schaffhauser

The Green Policy Center is launching a new project in order to promote the gradual climate-neutralization of the portfolios of Hungarian banks, both by introducing banks to climate-neutral banking options on the supply side, and by increasing social awareness on the demand side.


In 2015, the countries of the world adopted the Paris Agreement, in which they committed themselves to limit the increase of the global average temperature to 1.5°C and to transition their societies and economies to climate-neutral operation. In accordance with this, Hungary was the first in the region to declare by law that Hungary will become climate neutral by 2050. A recent report by the UN’s scientific panel on climate change, the IPCC, showed that solutions are available in all sectors to halve emissions by 2030 compared to 2019 levels in order to keep the 1.5°C temperature target in reach, however quick action is critical. In the green transition of the economy and society, the role of banks can be of fundamental importance by ensuring sustainable and green financing.

In Hungary, thanks to the Sustainable Financial Action Plan of the EU and the green finance program of the Hungarian National Bank, significant progress has been made in the field of green financing among banks in recent years. However, it seems that such green financial activities are typically not aligned with conscious climate neutrality goals, and the concept of climate neutral banking is missing from professional thinking.

The essence of net zero banking is, by definition, the net zeroing of financed greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, i.e. the balancing of emissions and removals.

On the other hand, due to the current energy price crisis, it is extremely important to keep green aspects on the agenda both in the banking sector and among the population, so that strategic and business decisions do not lack longer-term, green aspects. The project aims to actively change this on both the supply and demand side, during which it targets banks, customers and decision-makers with the help of various awareness raising and educational activities.

The project called Net Zero Banking, launched in August 2022 under the auspices of the Green Policy Center, aims to increase the awareness of both the banking sector and the public in the area of climate-neutral banking with various actions over the next year. Both climate policy and financial experts actively participate in the project, covering several aspects of sustainable finance.

In the course of the project, the current situation of the Hungarian banking sector in the field of green finance will be assessed, and various banking strategies and considerations will be analyzed with the help of interviews with banking sector actors. After that, in response to the challenges facing the domestic banking sector, the project team will support Hungarian banks with practical advice by preparing a climate-neutral banking manual. At the same time, during the project, various awareness-raising events, lectures and articles will also try to familiarize both the banking sector and the public with the concept and possibilities of climate-neutral banking.

If you would like to find out more information about the project, you can contact the members of the project team at the following contact details:


Gábor Gyura

Consultant, sustainable finance and ESG
gabor.gyura@un.org

Tibor Schaffhauser

Senior Climate Policy Advisor, International and EU climate policy, green finance

tibor.schaffhauser@greenpolicycenter.com

Tibor Fejes

Sustainable finance advisor, climate risk expert, banking supervisor, economist

tibor.fejes@greenpolicycenter.com


Related Articles

 

The sense of urgency has not yet entered the room – taking stock of the first week of COP27

The sense of urgency has not yet entered the room – taking stock of the first week of COP27

Just before midnight on Saturday evening, the technical negotiations of the UN COP27 climate conference currently taking place in Egypt have ended, giving the opportunity to the ministers arriving in the second week to reach political agreements. Although we have seen some progress and the positions of developed and developing countries have converged, there is still a lot of work ahead of the negotiators in the second week of the conference in order to be able to talk about real results in Egypt. A quick analysis by a colleague of the Green Policy Center on site.

UN climate conference – Balancing between finance and ambition

UN climate conference – Balancing between finance and ambition

This week, the 27th annual climate conference of the United Nations the COP27 begins under the presidency of Egypt. The “African COP”, as the developing countries refer to the conference, faces serious challenges: it must simultaneously increase the ambition to reduce emissions in order to maintain the climate goals and preserve a ray of hope for small island states of survival, as well as meet the developing countries’ huge financial expectations. Will the Egyptian presidency manage to reach agreements acceptable to all parties and what role will the European Union play in all of this?
Although we are currently mostly occupied with the energy price crisis, we must not forget the challenges caused by climate change. That is why it is worth paying attention to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt, where delegates from nearly 200 UN countries are expected to discuss the most burning issues of international climate policy in the next two weeks. And there are plenty of burning issues; this year we have all felt the negative effects of climate change on our own skins, just think of the summer droughts and forest fires, or the floods in Pakistan that claimed 1,500 lives and caused 30 billion dollars in damages.
One of the most controversial topics in the coming weeks will be related to these events; the so-called Loss and Damage negotiations. According to the IPCC, the climate change scientific advisory body of the UN, climate change threatens the lives and livelihoods of 3.3-3.6 billion people in the future. Climate change strongly affects the poorest strata of the population, as they are much less able to adapt to its negative effects; developing countries are therefore demanding a new financial fund to compensate for the damage caused by climate change. Since developing countries generally emit less greenhouse gases and they are still affected by climate change, they are calling upon developed countries to finance this new fund due to climate justice and the “historical responsibility” of developed countries. However, opinions differ as to what amount would be sufficient; calculations are about expected damage between 1-1.8 trillion and 5.6 trillion dollars by 2050.
The United States, as well as the European Union and its member states, have so far opposed the establishment of a separate financial fund, fearing that, if it is created, there will be no limit to the financial claims of developing countries. During the negotiations, the EU has also underlined that there are already an existing fora for the topic under the UN umbrella, and that developed countries have undertook to mobilize 100 billion dollars yearly to support the climate protection efforts of developing countries. Since we have not yet succeeded in achieving this goal, the developing countries are distrustful of the developed countries for the time being.
In order to rebuild trust, several European member states have already offered resources to deal with Loss and Damage, and developed countries have pledged to double the resources offered for adaptation action. Furthermore, developed countries are also developing a delivery plan on reaching the 100 billion dollar per year goal, and started negotiations to define the new long-term climate financing goal as well. However, according to the position of the EU and its member states, public resources alone will not be sufficient to curb climate change, so we recommend starting negotiations on how to bring global financial processes in line with the 2050 climate neutrality goals. It is still an open question whether this topic will be on the agenda or whether developing countries will only see it as a distraction from the immediate mobilization of finance.
The chance of survival of small island states is an open question at the moment as well. If we cannot keep the rise of the global average temperature below 1.5°C, several of these countries may drown in the sea, so it is really a matter of life and death for them to reduce emissions as ambitiously as possible. Last week, the UN environment and climate change organizations both published their assessments on how we are doing in the fight against climate change. While we could be optimistic after last year’s climate conference because of the new commitments announced there. according to these latest analyses, we are no longer doing so well in terms of implementation. Among the major emitters, only the EU and the USA have reduced their emissions, while the global GHG emissions have reached new all-time record high levels. Another cause for concern is the fact that even if the current commitments are fully fulfilled, we can still expect a warming of around 2.8°C by the end of our century – not aligned with the 1,5°C pathway recommended by science and necessary for the survival of small island states.
For the EU and its member states, the progress under the mitigation work program up to 2030 during COP27 is therefore of outstanding importance, so that the countries of the world can formulate more ambitious climate policy steps as soon as possible. This is not only important for the survival of small island states, but if we can keep climate change under control, its negative effects will cause less loss and damage, and the we need to mobilize less resources to compensate for those. As we can see, everything is connected with everything, which is why the Egyptian COP presidency will be in a difficult situation in the next two weeks. We can hope for all of our sake that they manage to deliver on the expectations of all sides, both on ambition and finance.